Fireflies AI alternatives: 5 tested, simpler and free
We tested the top Fireflies alternatives. Fireflies is powerful but heavy — leaving for a simpler tool, a real free plan, or no bot? Here's the one that fits.
Contents
Fireflies is one of the most powerful AI notetakers there is — and that is exactly why people leave it. It is built as a team meeting-intelligence platform, with organization-wide search, conversation analytics, topic trackers, and CRM automation stacked around the core of recording your calls. For a large sales team that lives in all of that, it earns its place. For everyone else, it is more tool, more interface, and more cost than the job requires.
So most people switching off Fireflies are not looking for something bigger; they are looking for something simpler, cleaner, and often free. We have tested the leading notetakers and run one controlled meeting through several of them, so rather than listing tools at random we can point you to the one that gives you what you actually wanted from a notetaker without the weight Fireflies wraps around it. The short answer for most people is Fathom — simpler, cleaner, and free without the caps — with Granola the pick if your reason for leaving is the bot.
The best Fireflies alternatives at a glance
We tested the leading notetakers head-to-head, Fireflies included, and surveyed the rest of the field. Here is where they land for someone leaving Fireflies:
- Best overall, and best free: Fathom — does the core job more simply, on a genuinely unlimited free plan with no storage caps or AI credits, and still syncs to a CRM. 4.6 / 5.
- Best for live transcription and individuals: Otter.ai — a lighter take on the searchable archive, plus a live transcript and in-person recording. 3.8 / 5.
- Best bot-free: Granola — captures your call with no bot in the room, where Fireflies sends one by default. 4.6 / 5.
- Best for sales analytics: Avoma — the closest like-for-like for the conversation intelligence Fireflies is known for, fit better to a sales workflow.
- Best free with clips: tl;dv — unlimited free recording with saved video, shareable highlights, and a bot-free desktop mode.
If you just want the short version: leaving because Fireflies is more than you need? Start with Fathom. Leaving because of the bot? Granola. Leaving but you still need the sales analytics? Avoma.
Why people leave Fireflies
Fireflies is not a weak product — it is a strong one aimed at a specific buyer, and our full Fireflies review rates it 4.4 out of 5 on the strength of that. The reasons people leave are mostly about that aim being wrong for them, and naming each one points at a different replacement.
It is more than most people need. Fireflies is built for the team that wants to measure and automate its meetings: analytics dashboards, talk-time tracking, topic trackers, and CRM workflows. If all you want is a clean summary of your calls, that machinery is weight you carry and pay for without using, and a simpler notetaker like Fathom or Granola does the core job with far less around it.
The free plan is capped and credit-gated. Fireflies’ free tier gives you unlimited transcription but stores only 400 minutes for the whole team and meters its AI features with a credit system, so you run into limits sooner than the word “free” suggests. Fathom’s free plan has no minute cap and no AI credits to ration, which is the single most common upgrade path we see people take off Fireflies.
The bot joins by default. Fireflies records by sending a visible bot into your meeting. On internal calls that is fine, but on a client or sales call a recorder in the participant list is awkward or against policy, and Fireflies’ only no-bot path is a limited Chrome-extension capture rather than the full bot-free experience Granola is built around. That sends people to Granola, which captures device audio with nothing in the call at all.
The interface is busy. Power users like having every analytic and integration on hand, but a lot of people find Fireflies cluttered next to the clean, summary-first output of Fathom or Granola. When you mostly read the recap and move on, the dashboard is noise.

Cost adds up at scale. Fireflies is reasonably priced per seat, but a team paying for analytics and automation it does not fully use is overspending. If the value you get is just the notes, a more generous tool delivers that for less, or for nothing. None of this makes Fireflies a bad tool — it makes it the wrong weight for a lot of the people using it, and each gap has a cleaner answer.
What to look for when you switch
Leaving Fireflies usually means trading down in complexity, so the question is which simpler tool keeps the parts you valued while dropping the parts you did not. Weigh these before you move your meetings.
How real the free plan is. This is the biggest variable, since Fireflies’ free tier is capped and credit-gated. Fathom’s free plan is genuinely unlimited; tl;dv’s is unlimited too; Otter’s stops at 300 minutes a month. Read the actual limits, because a free plan that caps storage or meters AI is the thing you are probably trying to escape.
Whether a bot joins the call. Fireflies sends one by default, with only a limited extension as the exception. If a silent footprint is part of why you are leaving, a genuinely bot-free tool fixes it — Granola by design, Jamie, or tl;dv’s desktop mode. Most of the bigger names still send a visible bot.
How much analytics you actually need. Be honest about whether you used Fireflies’ talk-time charts, topic trackers, and CRM automation, or just read the summaries. If you used them, your only real swaps are Avoma or staying put. If you did not, almost any simpler tool is an upgrade in focus.
| What to weigh when you switch | Why it decides the pick |
|---|---|
| Free-plan reality | Fireflies caps storage + meters AI with credits — Fathom and tl;dv are uncapped |
| Bot vs bot-free | Fireflies defaults to a visible bot; only Granola, Jamie, tl;dv’s desktop mode are fully silent |
| Analytics you truly use | Used them → Avoma; just read summaries → any simpler tool |
| Summary quality | A clean recap beats a dashboard you have to interpret |
| In-person + mobile | Only Otter records meetings in a room, not just video calls |
Summary quality over dashboards. The point of a notetaker is the recap. If a tool hands you a clean, structured summary that separates decisions from discussion, that is worth more than a wall of analytics, and it is where Fathom and Granola outshine the heavier platforms.
How we picked
We did not put this together from marketing pages and feature grids. We wrote full, hands-on reviews of the three leading notetakers and ran one controlled test through them: an 80-second, two-speaker product meeting we generated with synthetic voices, loaded with names, numbers, and jargon, so we knew the exact right answer in advance. Fathom recorded it, Granola captured it as a quick note, and Otter took it as a file import, all in June 2026.
That shared test is why we can rank the top tools honestly. Fathom produced the cleanest summary and the most accurate transcript, keeping “Q3”, “$16 to $19”, and “tag it P1” intact, which is why it is our top switch for most people leaving Fireflies. Granola matched it closely while adding bot-free capture, and Otter held the live transcript and in-person strengths. Fireflies itself we have since run through this same clip for our full Fireflies review: it matched Fathom on the planted specifics, keeping “Q3” where Otter dropped it, with a single punctuation slip its only error.
The honest line on what that means: the tools we recommend most, Fathom, Granola, and Otter, we have run end to end and scored, and so is Fireflies itself, the tool you are leaving, so those verdicts come from use. The wider field, the sales-analytics tools and the rest, we have assessed from documentation and ratings, enough to place each accurately but not to claim we lived in it. Below, the five alternatives that came out ahead, starting with the simpler, more generous tool most Fireflies-leavers are looking for.
| Tool | Best for | Free plan | Bot? | Analytics | Tested? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fathom | Simpler + unlimited free | Unlimited | Yes (bot-free beta) | Light | Yes (4.6/5) |
| Otter | Live transcript + in-person | 300 min/mo | Yes | Light | Yes (3.8/5) |
| Granola | Bot-free capture | Limited history | No | None | Yes (4.6/5) |
| Avoma | Sales analytics, fit better | 14-day trial | Yes | Deep | Surveyed |
| tl;dv | Free + clips | Unlimited | Optional | Light | Surveyed |
1. Fathom — the best Fireflies alternative overall
If you are leaving Fireflies because it is more tool than you need, Fathom is the answer, because it does the core job — record, transcribe, summarize — better and with far less around it. There is no analytics dashboard to learn and no credit system to watch; you join a call and get a clean, structured summary when it ends. We rated it 4.6 out of 5, the highest of any notetaker we tested.
It also fixes the free-plan complaint directly. Fireflies caps free storage at 400 minutes for the whole team and meters its AI with credits; Fathom’s free plan records, transcribes, and summarizes unlimited meetings with no cap and no credits, and keeps your full history. For a lot of people that difference alone settles it, since Fathom gives away, uncapped, what Fireflies rations.

Crucially, it does not strand the sales users who liked Fireflies’ CRM side. Fathom’s Team and Business plans sync notes and action items into HubSpot and Salesforce and add coaching scorecards, so a rep keeps the CRM automation while losing the clutter. In our test its action items came timestamped and assignable, so the summary doubled as a to-do list, and it is the highest-rated notetaker on G2 at a near-perfect 5.0 across more than 6,000 reviews.

The honest catches against Fireflies: Fathom joins as a visible bot too, with its bot-free mode still in beta and Mac-only, so it does not fix that specific complaint, and it does not match Fireflies’ organization-wide search and deep analytics for a large team that genuinely needs them. But if you are leaving because Fireflies is too heavy, too capped on free, or too cluttered, Fathom answers all three.
Switch to Fathom if you want a simpler, cleaner notetaker on a genuinely unlimited free plan, while keeping CRM sync for sales. Read our full Fathom review, and the Otter vs Fathom comparison for more on its output.
2. Otter.ai — the best for live transcription and individuals
If what you valued in Fireflies was the searchable record of your calls, but you want it lighter and more personal, Otter is the switch. It keeps a clean, searchable archive of your transcripts like Fireflies does, but built around the individual rather than the team, so there is far less dashboard between you and your notes.
It also does two things Fireflies does not. It shows a live transcript with speaker labels as people speak, so you can read and act on the conversation during the meeting, and it records in person through a mature iOS and Android app, capturing a room, a lecture, or an interview, not just a scheduled video call. For anyone whose meetings are not all online, that alone makes it the better fit.

The trade-offs are real, and they are why Otter rates 3.8 to Fathom’s 4.6. Its free plan is tighter than Fireflies, at 300 minutes a month with a 30-minute cap per conversation, so it is a step down on generosity rather than up. It joins as a visible bot like Fireflies, so it does not solve that, and it has faced privacy scrutiny including a 2025 class-action and a default opt-in to training on your data.
So Otter is the pick when you want Fireflies’ transcript-and-archive strength in a lighter, more personal form, plus a live view and in-person capture. It is not the most generous on free, but for an individual who lives in transcripts, it fits better than either Fireflies or the summary-first tools.
Switch to Otter if you want a lighter searchable archive, a live transcript, or in-person recording. Read our full Otter.ai review, and the Otter vs Fireflies comparison for the direct matchup.
3. Granola — the best bot-free alternative
If the reason you are leaving Fireflies is the bot, Granola is the cleanest fix, because it joins nothing at all. Where Fireflies records by default through a visible bot, Granola captures your computer’s audio directly, so on a client or sales call there is no participant to explain. It deletes the audio once the transcript is written and lets you opt out of model training, which is a far calmer privacy posture than a bot that sits in the meeting.
Its summaries are strong, too, which matters because losing the bot should not mean losing quality. Granola’s approach is enhancement: you jot a few rough lines during the call, and it folds in everything it heard to return a structured write-up. In our test it surfaced owners and deadlines we had not typed but that were spoken aloud, and we rated it 4.6, level with Fathom.

The trade-offs against Fireflies are worth knowing. Granola keeps no video to re-watch, its free Basic plan limits how much of your older history you can see, and it runs only on Mac, Windows, and iPhone, with no Android or web app. It is also built for the individual, so it has none of Fireflies’ team-wide search or analytics; if those were the point for you, Granola is not the swap.
But for the specific job of capturing discreet, high-quality notes with nothing joining the call, none of that outweighs the silence. For anyone leaving Fireflies to lose the bot, Granola is the tool we would hand them first.
Switch to Granola if the visible bot is your reason for leaving and you want the quietest possible capture without giving up summary quality. Read our full Granola review.
4. Avoma — the best for sales teams that want the analytics
If you are leaving Fireflies but the conversation intelligence was the part you actually used, Avoma is the closest like-for-like, because it plays the same game from a sales-first angle. Where Fireflies bolts analytics onto a general notetaker, Avoma is built from the ground up as a revenue-intelligence platform, so its call scoring, talk-to-listen tracking, coaching, and pipeline analytics tend to fit a sales workflow more cleanly than Fireflies’ broader feature set.
That makes it the rare alternative on this list that is not about getting simpler. A sales manager leaving Fireflies because the coaching and deal insight did not quite fit, rather than because there was too much of it, will find Avoma covers the same ground with a sharper sales focus, including a Deal View that rolls calls up to the pipeline level.
It is priced and built for teams, not individuals: there is no permanent free plan, only a 14-day trial, and paid seats start at $19 a user. A separate Conversation Intelligence add-on at $29 a user layers in the call scoring and coaching. So it is overkill for anyone who just wants notes, and a genuine option only if the analytics were why you were on Fireflies in the first place.
| Avoma at a glance | |
|---|---|
| Best for | Sales and CS conversation analytics |
| Free plan | No — 14-day trial |
| Bot | Yes |
| Paid from | $19 a user; call scoring on the $29 add-on |
| Skip if | You wanted to get simpler, not stay analytics-heavy |
Switch to Avoma if the conversation analytics were the point of Fireflies for you and you want them fit better to a sales workflow. Skip it if you are leaving because Fireflies was too much, where a simpler tool serves you better.
5. tl;dv — the best free alternative with clip-sharing
tl;dv is the pick when you want to escape Fireflies’ capped free plan without giving up much. Its free tier records and transcribes unlimited meetings across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, with no storage cap or credit system to ration the AI, and it saves the video too. After Fireflies’ metered free plan, that uncapped recording is the immediate draw.
Its signature is sharing. tl;dv turns meeting moments into shareable, timestamped clips, so you can send a single decision or customer quote to a colleague instead of a whole transcript, which a product or research team often gets more use from than Fireflies’ analytics. And it answers the bot complaint partway: alongside its visible meeting bot, it now offers a bot-free desktop capture mode, so it can keep a silent footprint while still saving video.
The catch is that its most capable AI features sit on paid plans, so the free tier is best read as unlimited recording plus light AI, and its summaries, while good, did not in our broader testing match the structured polish of Fathom’s. It also does not replace Fireflies’ deep team analytics; it is a simpler, more generous recorder, not a meeting-intelligence platform.
| tl;dv at a glance | |
|---|---|
| Best for | Free, unlimited recording with clips |
| Free plan | Yes, unlimited recordings + saved video |
| Bot | Optional — visible bot or bot-free desktop mode |
| Standout | Timestamped clip-and-share highlights |
| Skip if | You relied on Fireflies’ deep team analytics |
Switch to tl;dv if you want an uncapped free recorder with clip-sharing and the option of a silent desktop mode. Skip it if the team analytics were what kept you on Fireflies, where it does not compete.
Other Fireflies alternatives worth knowing
Beyond the five picks, several more tools surface often enough in Fireflies comparisons to be worth placing:
- Jamie is a bot-free, German-built option with a GDPR-first posture, recording via system audio with nothing in the call. It is a natural second choice to Granola for anyone leaving Fireflies over the bot, especially in Europe.
- MeetGeek is a lighter automated-intelligence tool that syncs action items and organizes analytics, a reasonable pick for a team that wants some of Fireflies’ reporting without the full platform, and it carries a generous free plan.
- Notion AI suits a team that wants meeting notes living inside the same workspace as its docs and projects rather than in a standalone tool, folding the record into the knowledge base.
- Fellow leans into the meeting itself, with collaborative agendas, templates, and both bot and bot-free recording, a fit for a team that wants structure around the call as much as the AI summary.
- Notta is a transcription-first option with broad language support and file imports, better when the accurate transcript itself is the deliverable rather than a summarized recap.
| Also worth knowing | Best for |
|---|---|
| Jamie | Bot-free, German-built, GDPR-first — second to Granola |
| MeetGeek | Lighter automated meeting intelligence, generous free plan |
| Notion AI | Meeting notes inside a wider workspace |
| Fellow | Collaborative agendas and meeting structure |
| Notta | Multilingual, transcription-first records |
We are not ranking these above the five picks because, for the jobs most people leaving Fireflies actually have, Fathom, Otter, and Granola cover them better and we have tested all three ourselves. But a complete list should show you the whole field, and that is the field.
Fireflies versus the top alternatives, head to head
If you are weighing Fireflies directly against the tools people most often compare it to, here is the short version of each matchup.
Fireflies vs Fathom. The one that matters for most people. Fathom wins on the unlimited free plan, cleaner summaries, and simplicity; Fireflies wins only if you genuinely need organization-wide search and deep analytics across a big team. For an individual or small team, Fathom is the lighter, more generous choice, and we rated it 4.6.
Fireflies vs Otter. A question of scale and shape. Otter is the better individual transcriber, with a live view and in-person recording; Fireflies is the better team brain, with search and analytics across a whole archive. We put them side by side in Otter vs Fireflies.
Fireflies vs Granola. These barely compete, because Granola is bot-free and individual-first while Fireflies is bot-based and team-first. If the bot or the complexity is your issue, Granola wins by design; if team-wide search is the point, Fireflies still holds.
| Matchup | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Fireflies vs Fathom | Depends | Fathom for simpler + unlimited free; Fireflies for big-team analytics |
| Fireflies vs Otter | Depends | Otter for the individual + live transcript; Fireflies for team search |
| Fireflies vs Granola | Depends | Granola if the bot or clutter is the issue; Fireflies for team analytics |
The throughline is that Fireflies rarely loses on capability — it loses on fit. It is more than most people need, and the right alternative is whichever one gives you the part you used without the rest.
How to pick your Fireflies alternative in 30 seconds
The fastest way to choose is to match the alternative to the exact reason you are leaving Fireflies:
- You left because it is more than you need → Fathom, simpler and on a genuinely unlimited free plan.
- You left because the free plan is capped and credit-gated → Fathom or tl;dv, both uncapped on free.
- You left because of the bot → Granola, bot-free by design, or Jamie as a second option.
- You left but still need the sales analytics → Avoma, the same conversation intelligence fit to sales.
- You want live transcription or in-person recording → Otter, the only one with a real mobile app.
- You want saved video and shareable clips → tl;dv, free and unlimited, with a bot-free desktop mode.
If you are unsure, the lowest-risk move is the one we would make: start on Fathom’s free plan, since most people leave Fireflies for something simpler and more generous and Fathom is exactly that, run a real week of meetings through it, and only look wider if your reason turns out to be the bot or the team analytics specifically. For the broader context, our best AI note taker roundup ranks the top picks side by side.
How to switch from Fireflies without losing your notes
There is not much to migrate when you leave Fireflies, since the work runs forward from the day you switch, but one step is worth doing before you disconnect.
Export anything from Fireflies you want to keep. Your past transcripts, summaries, and recordings live in your account, and Fireflies lets you export them, so pull down the meetings that still matter before you downgrade or cancel. Nothing you switch to will import that history for you, and this is worth doing up front because Fireflies’ free plan caps how far back you can reach once you stop paying.
Then connect the new tool and run the two in parallel. Fathom, Otter, and Granola set up in minutes, so you can run your replacement alongside Fireflies for a week of real meetings and compare the summaries side by side before committing. There is no risk in overlapping them for a few calls, and it is the best way to confirm a simpler tool really does cover what you used.
Cancel once you are confident. There is no lock-in beyond the history you already exported, so you can leave Fireflies the moment the new tool earns its place, which for most people is a handful of meetings.
Final word
Fireflies is not a tool you escape because it is bad; it is one you leave because it is built for a job bigger than yours. It is a genuine team meeting-intelligence platform, and if you run a large sales org that lives in search and analytics, it earns its keep. For everyone else, the analytics, the credits, the bot, and the busy interface are weight, and almost every reason for leaving now has a lighter answer.
For most people, that answer is Fathom: the same core notetaking done more simply, on a genuinely unlimited free plan, with the CRM sync the sales users still want. Start there, and read our Fathom, Otter, and Granola reviews for the detail behind each verdict.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best Fireflies alternative?
For most people it is Fathom, and the reason is that the most common complaint about Fireflies is that it is more tool than they need. Fireflies is a team meeting-intelligence platform built around analytics, topic trackers, and CRM automation; Fathom does the core job — record, transcribe, and summarize meetings — more simply and on a genuinely unlimited free plan with no storage cap or AI credit system. We tested it and rated it 4.6 out of 5, the highest in our notetaker testing, and it still syncs to a CRM for the sales overlap Fireflies users care about.
If your reason for leaving is different, the pick changes: Granola if you want to lose the bot, Otter if you want live transcription and in-person recording, and Avoma if you are a sales team that wants the analytics done in a way that fits your workflow better.
But as a simpler, cleaner, cheaper replacement for most Fireflies users, Fathom is the one to start with.
Is there a free Fireflies alternative?
Yes, and the most generous is Fathom, which is the single biggest reason people switch from Fireflies. Fireflies' free plan gives you unlimited transcription but stores only 400 minutes for the whole team and meters its AI features with a credit system, so you hit limits quickly. Fathom's free plan, by contrast, records, transcribes, and summarizes unlimited meetings with no minute cap and no AI credits to ration, and it keeps your full history.
tl;dv is the other strong free option, with unlimited recording across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams plus saved video and a bot-free desktop mode. Otter has a free tier too, but at 300 minutes a month it is tighter than Fireflies, so it is a step down on generosity rather than up.
If a real, uncapped free plan is your reason for leaving Fireflies, Fathom is the clear winner, with tl;dv close behind if you also want saved video and clips.
Is Otter or Fireflies better?
They are built for different scales, so it depends on whether you are an individual or a team. Otter is the better personal notetaker: it shows a live transcript with speaker labels as people speak, has a mature mobile app that records in person, and keeps a clean searchable archive, which suits a student, journalist, or solo professional. Fireflies is the better team brain: it runs AI search across everyone's calls, tracks talk-time and topic analytics, and automates CRM workflows, which a larger sales or success org needs.
Neither is the most generous on free use, so if cost is the driver, Fathom's unlimited free plan beats both.
The honest summary is that Otter is simpler and better for one person or live transcription, while Fireflies is heavier and better for a whole team that needs search and analytics across hundreds of calls. Pick Otter to get lighter; stay on Fireflies if the team analytics are the point.
Is Fathom or Fireflies better?
For most individuals and small teams, Fathom is better, and we rated it 4.6 out of 5. Its free plan is genuinely unlimited where Fireflies caps storage and meters AI with credits, its summaries are cleaner and more structured, and in our hands-on testing it produced the most accurate notes of any tool we ran. It also runs simpler, without the busy analytics dashboard Fireflies wraps around the core notetaking.
Fireflies pulls ahead in one situation: a large team that genuinely needs organization-wide search across every call, conversation analytics, and deep CRM automation at scale, which is the job Fireflies was built for and Fathom keeps lighter on purpose.
So a solo user or small team that finds Fireflies overkill should move to Fathom, while a big sales or success org that lives in the analytics may be right to stay. Match the tool to whether you want power or simplicity.
What is a bot-free Fireflies alternative?
Granola is the strongest bot-free alternative to Fireflies, since Fireflies records by default through a visible bot and Granola joins nothing at all. It captures your computer's audio directly, so there is no recorder in the participant list, which is ideal for client or sales calls where a bot is awkward or against policy. It also deletes the audio once the transcript is written and lets you opt out of AI training, the calmest privacy posture in this group, and we rated it 4.6 out of 5.
Beyond Granola, Jamie is a German-built, GDPR-first bot-free option, and tl;dv has added a bot-free desktop capture mode alongside its meeting bot. Fathom offers a bot-free mode too, though it is still in beta and Mac-only.
For most people leaving Fireflies specifically to lose the bot, Granola is the cleanest and most proven answer, and it produces a polished summary on top.
What is the best Fireflies alternative for sales teams?
For a sales team that wants Fireflies-style conversation intelligence — call scoring, coaching, talk-time analytics, and pipeline insight — Avoma is the closest like-for-like, built from the ground up as a revenue-intelligence platform rather than a general notetaker. The right pick still depends on what your team actually used Fireflies for.
If you mostly need clean call notes synced into HubSpot or Salesforce without the heavier analytics layer, Fathom's Business plan does that more simply and on a far more generous free tier for the reps who do not need coaching. For the largest revenue orgs, Gong sits above all of them at a much higher price.
So a sales team leaving Fireflies because it is too complex or expensive should look at Fathom; a sales team leaving because it wants deeper, better-fitting coaching and deal analytics should look at Avoma. Both beat Fireflies on a specific axis, and which one depends on whether you want lighter or more specialized.